True Gotham

As of today, the banks have lowered the rates on loans from $417,000-$729,000 to slightly more than the non-jumbo loans. If anyone has a loan in this range, the interest rate is currently 6.125% on a 30 year fixed.

Posted By Daniel Shlufman | Permalink | 7 Comments

I frequently receive emails from TG readers who have had both positive and negative experiences with real estate agents.  The following comes from a reader who felt like he and his wife were duped during the negotiation process by an agent who, from his accounts, seem to put her interest ahead of both her seller and this prospective purchaser.  Don't take my word for it.  read and decide for yourself:

My wife and I made a bid of $780k on an apartment on 74th Street that was listed for $799k. She (the seller's agent) told us that wouldn't do it and we needed to offer the asking price. I asked her what the owners' counter-offer was and she said that if we offered the asking price we would get the apartment. I asked my question again and was given the same answer. I firmly believe that our offer was never conveyed to the owners since this was all occurring on the phone in one conversation.

Around this time we got rid of the broker we were working with because she was basically showing us $1.2 million condos on 90th and York, which we couldn't afford and were in neighborhoods we didn't want to live in (bad listener).  She seemed quite inexperienced and was so frazzled by the seller's agent that I was more or less dealing with the seller's agent directly anyway.

About 10 days later the seller's agent called me at work and said that there was a "slight glitch" with the apartment.  She thought they had an offer of $800k for the apartment and it turns out that the offer was really $780k, so she wanted to know if we were still interested in the apartment. I told her that we were and that our previous offer had actually been $780k, but we would offer $782k.   She immediately told me that the asking price would get us the apartment. I asked her why she didn't give our offer to the owners and see what they said first.  She refused and said we should consider offering the asking price if we wanted the apartment.

We really liked the apartment and felt that our bid was fair based on comps that we did. I had to do all of the comp work because the broker we got rid of said she wasn't sure what a good comp would be (again a good reason to not work with her anymore). I called the seller's agent back the next day and said that we could go to $792k. We wanted this apartment, but we didn't want to overpay more than was necessary.  The seller's agent again said that the asking price would get us the apartment. I suggested that she actually go to the owners and give them our offer before saying that and we would listen to their counter-offer.  She again said that the asking price would get us the apartment.  At this point, I told her that I thought she was full of "it" and that she was using us for leverage and had no intention of actually giving any of our bids to the owners.

The apartment ended up being sold for $780k to the original people that we had been bidding against 3 weeks earlier. The seller's agent let slip that she was representing the other buyer too which shows that she was more interested in a $780k sale that was all hers than a $792k sale that she had to split with our broker who wasn't even involved in the negotiation process. She had also previously suggested to me that the owners might be more flexible if we just worked with her because other brokers would "just get in the way".

I was absolutely disgusted by the way we were treated and used by her.  We ended up buying an apartment on 56th Street for $675k that we put another $45k into renovating. We did like the apartment on 74th Street more and were willing to pay a fair and reasonable amount for it, but we never really had a chance because the playing field wasn't level as the seller's agent kept saying to us, "If you want to be in the game you have to offer the asking price."

I cannot put into words, even now, the anger that I feel for allowing this agent to get away with treating us this way.  She was clearly manipulating the system for her own gain without any care for how she was treating the people involved in the transaction. Her fee was all that mattered to her.

This has certainly given me a specific view of brokers in NYC. I know that they are all not like this agent, but there are enough that are like her out there. I appreciate all of your work to give the industry more transparency. I am a partner in a recruiting firm, so I know quite well how much a person's reputation can help or hurt a process. In my 11 years in this field I have never met someone so devious in their negotiating tactics as this particular agent. She was so brazen in her deception and incompetence that she told me she was doing it (as stated above).

Now of course we don't have the agent's account of what happened (and I'm sure it is VERY different), but the most important factor in my mind is the perception that this particular consumer walks away with regarding the real estate profession.  I can't stress enough how important that I believe it is to have a competent agent working for you whether you are buying or selling a home.  And always be mindful that although a seller's agent (more than 80% of my personal business is representing sellers) has a fiduciary responsibility to their seller, it is not unheard of for an agent to get in their own way and put their interest ahead of even the seller's.  I still maintain that the direct deal should die and that both sides of a transaction should be represented by a competent real estate agent (PODCAST).  Until this happens, there is just too much temptation for agents to consider their bottom line first.

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 1 Comments

I apologize for the light postings lately but business and life in general have kept me away from the blog.  As my friend Peter Comitini says, "I'm a real estate broker who blogs, not a blogger who sells real estate."  That said, the market is indeed keeping me busy and on my toes as a great deal more effort is going into each and every transaction these days. 

Here is an anecdotal snapshot (activity all over the map) of what I see going on right now in the Manhattan Residential Real Estate market:

• Contract finally signed over the asking price after 5 Highest, Best and Final Offers
• Some buyers are lowering budgets based on interest rates and tighter lending requirements while others continue their search and raise budgets.
• Many properties are being snapped up after several months on the market as soon as price is adjusted appropriately for current buying pool (i.e. Property on market for 4 months overpriced at $1.15M sells immediately after price adjustment to $999K)
• Mortgage contingencies are much more common in deals under $2M.
• Multiple offers and contract out over the asking price for a West Village 2BR (inventory in each area of city still low and sometimes creating bidding frenzies)
• Other properties sit on the market "patiently" waiting for the "right" buyer to walk in.
• "Creative" offers being submitted by unqualified buyers (i.e. $5000 deposit on a $2M home contingent on 90% financing and the sale of another home...good luck)  NEWS ALERT!!!!...we're not in a market that will generally entertain such an offer unless a seller is desperate and there just aren't too many of those.
• Inventory is opening up a bit in the sub $1M market.
• Buyers are patient but eager to buy while interest rates are low.
• Anxiety has calmed a bit as many see Wall Street bleeding near an end.
• The ultra lux inventory remains tight as people wait for their perfect home to hit the market.

That's about it.  Again, this is what I see in my business.  Make of it what you will but there is no doubt that we are in a much different market than we were this same time last year.  In some ways it feels more "healthy" but I would be lying if I didn't say that I preferred the deal flow last year.  Things do seem to be picking up though which is in large part why I haven't been blogging as frequently.

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 10 Comments

I'm generally resistant to blog about such topics here on TrueGotham because everyone has their own charitable organizations that they support.  That said, the couple of times I have chosen to do so, I have been delighted by the generosity of my readers.  So here goes...

It’s that time of year again and on May 14th, City Harvest’s Annual Skip Lunch Fight Hunger program will look to shatter the ONE DAY fund-raising record of $465,000 last year!!!

Each year City Harvest trucks pick up and deliver food throughout NYC providing hundreds of thousands of meals for NYC's hungry children.

Here’s how effective Skip Lunch Fight Hunger is:

* Nearly 350,000 children in NYC don’t have enough to eat.
* $5 provides 4 children with lunch for an entire week!
* $10 provides 2 children with lunch for an entire month!
* $25 provides 2 children with lunch for the entire summer!

So on May 14th City Harvest's Skip Lunch Fight Hunger program asks everyone to Skip Lunch and donate that money to help fight hunger in NYC.  A better idea...eat lunch and donate generously anyway?

Here are just some of the Faces of Hunger in NYC.

DONATE ON-LINE

A little goes a VERY long way and no donation is too small or too big!

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 0 Comments

With housing markets slumping across the country, I have been receiving an unbelievable amount of inquiries in to just how to go about successfully raffling off your house. Since I have absolutely NO experience with such a house raffle, I posed the question to Bruce Anderson, CEO of San Mar Children's Home and one of the successful orchestrators of such a raffle that took place in Hagerstown, MD. It's not easy at all says Bruce but he graciously offered the following for anyone who is considering a house raffle:

Having just completed a very successful house raffle in which we raffled a house ($380,000) and a car in 77 days resulting in a $214,000 net profit for the charity we have been besieged with calls and emails from all across the country asking us to tell others how to do it. The Maryland Secretary of State, the office issuing the required permit to conduct a house raffle, tells us that since the conclusion of our raffle they have been receiving more permit requests than ever before from persons who desire to replicate what we have done. Unfortunately, most will fail.

Conducting a house raffle is a high-risk adventure with no guarantee of success. With that having been said let me share a few of the observations, if not actual lessons, gleaned from our recent experience:

1. Do your homework ahead of time. Many raffles fail due to the persons beginning without a good understanding of what is involved in the process, and therefore plan improperly.
2. Get the right nonprofit from the outset. Each state is going to require that the raffle be conducted by a nonprofit organization. If you are the homeowner it is vital to match up with a charity that has the ability to accomplish such an event. How can you tell? Well, as stated earlier there is no guarantee, however, look for the following: Do they have a track record of knowing how to raise money? Do they have an active board that believes such a project can succeed? Are they as a board willing to work to make it successful? Have they helped other projects of the organization? Do they have connections to the media? What is their reputation in the community? What is their appeal to the broader community beyond the local area? Do they have vision for their organization?
3. Beware of narrow marketing. Market beyond your local community. Many raffles fail due to marketing only to their own community. One of the biggest mistakes is to not allow enough time to complete the project. Typically a house raffle should take between six and eight months. That may be true, however, we completed ours in 77 days due to marketing beyond our own community. Additionally, do not limit marketing efforts to any one or two actions. For example don’t think sending letters to your mailing list and a letter in the paper is going to sell all your tickets. Get as creative as you can and generate as much momentum as possible in as many ways you can. Some of the things we did: Sent a mailing to our mailing list, put up posters all over the county, contacted the local paper and convinced them of the interest behind a family raffling their home (we ended up with 6 front page – Sunday editions that specifically talked about he story), The local TV station picked up the story, AP press ran the story opening the door to numerous newspapers around the world, we ran a story in the Chamber of Commerce newsletter, we spoke before service groups, we wrote of the event in numerous blogs, we contacted radio stations all over America and shared how we had a AP story of interest. That lead to numerous interviews. One radio station in Florida followed the story regularly interviewing the Realtor we worked with at regular intervals. These are just a few!
4. Set up a website for on-line (secure) credit card purchases. Have this in place as soon as you are ready to go. We had our website and credit card processing system in place but not before the local paper ran a front page story of what we hoped to do. We were able to contact an Associated Press reporter and convinced him to pick up the story. The problem was that the story went national before we had a permit. We simply took orders and did not process any cards until the permit was in hand. Include on the website a counter that gives regular and accurate feedback as to the progress of ticket sales. We were amazed at the number of people who were following the progress daily (We also set up a stat counter on the website).
5. Pay absolute attention to details and use integrity in everything. We maintained meticulous records of every ticket sold. We kept all ticket stubs in alphabetical order so when someone called and told us they purchased a ticket on-line and never received a stub in the mail we were able to at once find their records and get a copy to them. At the end, the day of the drawing, we turned everything over to a CPA firm and had them conduct an audit on all the tickets so that we could testify to the truth of a ticket being in the barrel for every person making a purchase.
6. Determine to enjoy the process and attack every obstacle with tenacity!
   These are just a few of the things we did and learned. Will we do it again? We have certainly been asked … we shall see!
   
   Bruce T. Anderson, CEO San Mar Children’s Home

Thanks so much Bruce for your time and energy in providing these excellent tips.

REMEMBER...IT AIN'T EASY!!!

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 3 Comments

For you straphangers out there who constantly complain about New York City's subways, suggesting that they are too crowded, I give you this YouTube Video of Japanese "Pushers" stuffing passengers into a train:

TAAAAAAAXI!!!!...or shall I say takushi?

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 2 Comments

Discrimination in today's day and age will always continue to surprise me.  But as a real estate professional and father of a 6 year old son and 4 year old daughter, it is almost unbelievable that agents are out there telling prospective renters that a landlord isn't interested in renting to people with kids.   Andy Newman of The New York Times reveals that a Couple’s Suit Accuses Real Estate Firm of Bias Against Children.  First let's be mindful that a lawsuit in itself means nothing and that all parties remain innocent until proven guilty but should this instance prove to be true then I feel very strongly that the landlord and any agent involved should be punished.

The apartment sounded beautiful: a converted carriage house on a quiet lane in Brooklyn Heights, with a deck. Jamie Katz and Lisa Nocera were excited.

There was only one catch: Dr. Nocera, an emergency-medicine physician, was expecting. The broker...would not show them the apartment because the owners did not want to rent to a family with children, the couple said.

A year later, in 2007, now with baby in tow, the couple were shown an apartment in a brownstone in Park Slope, perhaps the city’s most child-centric neighborhood. They loved it. They passed a credit check.

Then the broker called with bad news. There was a problem with lead paint; the owner would not rent to families with children, they said.

Mr. Katz and Dr. Nocera thought something was amiss.

A few weeks later in Brooklyn Heights, same story: Sorry, lead paint, no kids. “I immediately knew something was definitely wrong,” Dr. Nocera said.

When the agent named in the lawsuit was asked about this she responded by saying:

"I would have said it was not kid-friendly based on there being lead paint issues.  Wouldn’t that be a good enough reason?” In fact, the federal Fair Housing Act outlaws doing anything to discourage someone from renting an apartment based on family status, whether by steering the potential renter away or by outright refusal to rent. So do state and city human-rights laws.

And although I have come across these types of misinformed and misguided agents in the past it had been quite some time...until last week. 

I'm representing the seller of a condo in the West Village who currently has a tenant in place.  In an effort to facilitate the sale as well as a smooth transition for the tenant, I and my team have been trying to locate a suitable rental.  The past week has reminded me why I left the rental business almost 14 years ago...it's the MOST inefficient marketplace in the world IMHO!  That's an entirely other topic.  Back to discrimination.  Last week, we reached out to an agent representing a landlord in the West Village to inquire about the property.  She provided few additional details other than what was in her vague online description.  The kicker was when she heard that the couple had two children she said, "the landlord lives downstairs and isn't going to want children running above her head" and hung up the phone. 

Many years ago when I was immersed in the Manhattan rental market, it was not so rare to have a landlord boldly state that they wanted no couples with children, "kids" in their 20's, or even attorneys.  God forbid you rent to an attorney.  That by the way always made me ponder the question of why an honest landlord would be afraid of an attorney?  Again, another topic for another day.

Obviously, there are still real estate agents out there who don't understand the Fair Housing Act and perhaps there are even a few (I really don't think too many in today's marketplace) who just don't care.  Educating these agents is imperative and I know that many if not all of the large firms in the city have had mandatory seminars as recent as this past winter to discuss just this topic.  Perhaps some of the attendees were busy on their Blackberrys when they discussed steering and discrimination? 

Time for another mandatory seminar perhaps?

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 0 Comments

A new client of mine sent me todays's James R. Hagerty Wall Street Journal article entitled The Brighter Side of Housing which suggests that many houing markets around the country have seen such increases in inventory and declines in prices that it may be an excellent opportunity for a buyer who was priced out of the market just 2 years ago.

And now for the heartwarming side of the housing bust: It's helping some people buy homes that they couldn't afford a couple of years ago.

Michelle Dudley for years commuted 50 miles each way to her job as a civil servant in Anaheim, Calif., because she and her husband, Don, didn't feel they could afford a home near her office. This week, though, the Dudleys moved into a three-bedroom house in Anaheim that they recently bought for $390,000, down from the original listing price of $445,000 in November. Similar homes in the area were selling for as much as about $600,000 two years ago, says Erin Eckert, an agent for Redfin, an online real-estate brokerage that represented the Dudleys.

Don't forget though that housing is made up of a plethora of micro-markets.

As usual, there is huge variation from town to town. In most of the country, inventories of unsold homes are no longer growing quickly, as they did in 2006 and 2007, but remain huge. The supply has shrunk modestly in Boston and Denver over the past year. But the number of for-sale signs continues to rise swiftly in the Portland, Ore.; Seattle; Raleigh-Durham, N.C.; San Francisco; and Washington areas.

Which brings me to my client's question this morning: "At all true for NYC??"  The answer: an unequivocal "Not really but it absolutely depends on the buyer's and seller's individual situations."  That is supposed to be funny. 

In Manhattan, the higher the quality of the buyer, the more leverage they have...sometimes. Of course the amount of leverage any buyer has is also dependent on the unique situation of a seller.  For example, a solvent buyer with a credit score over 800 who is financing 70% or less with prudent liquid reserves after purchase may have a considerable amount of leverage should they encounter a seller who must sell because of a relocation or job loss.  That same buyer may have to pay the asking price to the patient seller who is trading across the market. 

There are a multitude of factors that determine the direction of the Manhattan real estate transaction::

• Terms of buyer's offer: of course price, flexible closing date, contingent on financing or not.
• Solvency of buyers: how they present to the Board if a co-op, amount of financing, and liquidity position after purchase
• Seller's motivation: relocation, job loss, upsizing, downsizing, geographical move within the city
• Seller's perception of the market:  does seller think they will get the same price that their neighbor did last year (in some cases they will and in others they won't) or is the seller in panic mode fearing a future decline in prices?

So in Manhattan it remains difficult to gauge the current state of the real estate market as some transactions are taking place where buyers are experiencing some leverage and others see the sellers with the upper hand.  Navigating this marketplace continues to be challenging but definitely not impossible and often fruitful for one or both sides of the transaction. 

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 0 Comments

I must apologize for the light postings lately and the lack of original content but today's Manhattan real estate marketplace is requiring more effort and energy per deal than anytime in the past decade.  Don't misunderstand me here...I'm not bellyaching...just providing some insight as to why posting quantity and quality have suffered. 

So today again I provide you with links to some interesting topics around the real estate (and pot...yes marijuana) blogosphere:

• From Zillowblog comes Hey! Don’t Take My HELOC! which reveals the recent practice of banks freezing homeowner's lines of credit.
• Also from Zillowblog comes Owning vs. Renting a Home.  Check out the analysis.
• From the New York Observer (via Curbed) comes Manhattan-ifest Destiny revealing the recent phenomenon of more people moving from Manhattan and Brooklyn to LA than vice versa.
• A couple of weeks back, Jeff Byles of the New York Times penned Taking Back the Streets.  If you missed it, check out the possibilities for making New York a greener and more liveable space.
• From RealtyBaron comes“My current Realtor raised her commission…from 6 to 7%. Can i do better?”
• "Lady in Dublin believed the realtors, believed the media, and believed in the "housing ladder". And she's lost $100,000 already, and counting" (via HousingPanic)
• And finally, totally unrelated to real estate except that the NAR seems to be smokin' something (via Matrix), check this out from BoingBoing...Kids' book about pot: "It's Just a Plant" which suggests that it's OK for adults to break the law if they choose but children shouldn't...nice lesson...can't wait to teach THAT to my kids.

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 0 Comments

CoRE is up at Reachd.  Check it out with a particular nod to  Bad Pricing Strategies That Will Likely Come Back To Bite Sellers In The Arse! from Silicon Valley Real Estate Guide.

Posted By Douglas Heddings | Permalink | 0 Comments