The Cost of Doing Biz: Real Estate Agent Shakeout Coming

If you're thinking of becoming a real estate agent because you love architecture, find it fascinating, have always enjoyed looking at property, or better yet...think you're gonna cash in...THINK AGAIN.  As The Real Deal points out the upfront costs for agents are rising...significantly!

Residential real estate companies, claiming that it's harder than ever to eke out a profit, are increasingly hitting their own agents with additional fees and expenses.

The most dramatic move recently was the Corcoran Group's introduction of a $1,500 annual marketing fee, to come out of each agent's commission. Corcoran also decreased agent commissions by raising the threshold for higher splits to $160,000 in gross commissions, up from $140,000 previously.

Similarly, Bond New York is planning on raising the bar on commission splits this year, which means less money in agents' pockets.

"As rents get more expensive, costs of business become more expensive, and the scales that determine where a commission split increases get raised accordingly," said Bruno Ricciotti, a principal at Bond.

Although I'm sure the costs of doing business have increased for all the big players in the real estate industry, this has been a trend since I began selling real estate 15 years ago.  I have worked with 3 different companies and every single one of them has "hit its agents up" in the name of "rising costs" at various times throughout my tenure. I have also watched some of these companies "tighten the belts" of their agents only to see many defect to other companies hoping that the grass is greener.  Such defections by top agents often acts as a catalyst for the company to revisit and even change their recently instituted policies.  My point:  the profession like any other is dynamic. 

Over the past ten years many of the large companies have been in a hiring frenzy in an expansion effort like none other in Manhattan real estate history.  Now, as the entire industry has been simultaneously flooded with agents and inventory continues to constrict, the numbers just aren't as sexy as they once were for these firms.  Of course the quickest way to effect the companies bottom line is to essentially "tax" (various fees) the "population" (the agents).  It's the American way.

Neil Binder, principal and co-founder of Bellmarc Realty, is critical of the expenses firms are charging salespeople. In The Real Deal's Q & A this month, he said, "This has become backdoor income for a lot of companies, but I am not in favor of it, and it is not in our plans to do it. Some charge a computer fee of $1,500 a year and $1,000 a year for errors and omissions [insurance]. Those are names given to those expenses; they are just mechanisms to get additional money for the company, in my opinion."

On top of these new fees, there are increased membership dues to organizations like the Real Estate Board of New York, which recently made it mandatory for an agent to join if the agent's firm was a member of REBNY. And there could be new fees for the REBNY Web-based listing portal that is being floated.

At all real estate companies, salespeople are responsible for paying a slew of different fees before -- and while -- seeing a return on their investment.

Expenditures vary from company to company, but all traditional companies need their agents, at a minimum, to cover the cost of maintaining a desk, which can run upwards of $50,000 a year, said Barak Realty founder Barak Dunayer. Based on desk costs at Warburg Realty, agents there are expected to bring in at least $120,000 in gross commissions a year, according to president Frederick Peters.

To get started, prospective agents have to run the gamut of fees and charges. They have to pay $350 to $400 for a 45-hour, state-approved real estate course and a $15 entrance examination fee to get their license. Agents then pay a $50 fee to the Department of State, which licenses real estate agents and brokers, every two years.

At companies that belong to REBNY -- namely, most companies -- agents have an annual membership fee starting at $190. If the company is a member of the Manhattan Association of Realtors -- there are only 35 of them -- agents incur $350 board dues.

I must say that most of these fees are insignificant to the top producing agents who enjoy the largest company marketing budgets and the highest commission splits and most of whom spend a significant amount of their own money to stay ahead of the pack (that's precisely why they are top agents).  For instance, I budget an additional 20% of my net commissions to marketing above and beyond that which is provided by my company.  But for those who are new to the industry and may not close a transaction for 6-12 months, this spells T-R-O-U-B-L-E.  Hello to the 100% commission split firm:

For agents who work at 100 percent commission split firms, the up-front charges are even higher, because all administration and operation costs are on the agents.

At Rutenberg, in addition to the REBNY and Manhattan MLS fees, agents pay the company a $99 monthly fee, as well as a $1,000 or $2,000 transaction fee depending on sale price, Braddock said. Agents get a telephone number that forwards to their cellular or home phone, Rutenberg profile page and e-mail address. They have access to a company manager and use of a company office with a desk, fax machine and phone, but they don't get free business cards or a permanent workstation.

Following a similar corporate model, Pari Passu Realty charges a fixed $299 monthly fee but no transaction charge. Add $176 to the fixed fee, and the agent can get five New York Times advertisements, said Larry Link, the company's managing director. Agents pay a $200 administrative fee to be set up in the company system. "Our model works by providing all of the services for a fixed fee with no transaction fees," Link said.

It will be very interesting to see if and how this business model takes hold in Manhattan.  I suspect that if these companies start to attract top producers (not likely...yet), the "big player firms" will have to restructure their business model to stay competitive.

What's it all mean?  The real estate industry is changing and fast.  It's exciting to think that the industry as we all currently know it will likely be entirely different within 5 years.  As the market quiets down (and it will), information becomes more transparent, and companies increase agent costs, I suspect that the average income for a Manhattan real estate agent (and their brokers) will decrease significantly making it less attractive to enter the profession.  Can you say shake out?

I still believe that the industry is moving more towards the reality of  the "consultant type" real estate professional.  The good news for the consumer is that this agent will have to provide a level of service that will be beyond exemplary if they hope to stay profitable.  Until then...sit back and enjoy the ride.

Written By:Michael On May 9, 2007 3:46 PM

This is not a good thing for aspiring Real Estate agents. But as was mentioned, I believe you are correct the industry is moving more towards a "consultant-type" real estate professional. This is very evident in modern home buying. Since people immersed in the real estate industry are reading here I wanted to ask has anyone heard of the show Bought & Sold on HGTV? It’s a show about the inner workings of the real estate business right now. It basically shows 12 different agents trying to show houses and close their deals. It gives you great insight into the way homes are marketed and how price levels are decided upon in the Northern New Jersey market, which is one the toughest in the country. You can check out a preview - http://web.hgtv.com/webhgtv/images/pac/59889/start_at_home.html?section=boughtsold,panel=videos - It’s on Sundays at 10PM e/p time on HGTV. I work with them so this is how I know. Definitely highly recommended.

Written By:UrbanDigs On May 9, 2007 9:23 PM

very interesting take here Doug and I agree with all of it! I think this industry will shake out those agents who expected this to become a home run, part time gig.

Those that built their business already have less to worry about. Those that have $$$ and do this part time to pay the bills might be OK too. But in the end, there will be a dynamic shift in the years ahead as to which type of agents become top producers and the method they used to get there.

Great post Doug!

Written By:Doug Heddings On May 10, 2007 12:06 PM

Michael,

I reluctantly posted your comment as I really don't want this to become a forum for advertising. Having said that, your tip off to this new reality show may indeed interest my clients. I saw a preview however and I'm skeptical as to the "reality." First problem that I remember seeing is that you have an entirely white cast of players, who are all somewhat attractive...that alone skews reality...but good luck with the show.

Written By:Doug Heddings On May 10, 2007 12:09 PM

Thanks Noah. Agree that "some" of those part-timers who do one to three transactions a year (some at $15-20M) will still be around...it's a relationship business like most. Most consumers however will be hiring only those who "walk the talk" so to speak and provide a level of service that far exceeds any we have yet seen in the industry.

Written By:newbie On May 11, 2007 9:43 AM

"Some charge a computer fee of $1,500 a year and $1,000 a year for errors and omissions [insurance]. Those are names given to those expenses; they are just mechanisms to get additional money for the company, in my opinion".

Interesting commment, brings up memories when I purchased my place and the managing agent - a reputable real estate brokerage firm - charged me these outrageous "handling" fees for various documents as part of compliling by board package (like $200-$300 a pop). Also charging $350 for a credit check when my bank only charged $40....???

I know I'm getting off topic but it's the same concept.

Any thoughts?

Written By:Douglas Heddings On May 11, 2007 9:59 AM

Not "off topic" so much. It all relates to how ALL companies create ways to generate income to offset costs or perhaps just increase income. Precisely what the flip tax is for a co-op. Not a "tax" at all but a fee charges to a buyer or seller to beef up the reserve fund (not a bad thing in my opinion and my opinion has chenged recently). As the market contracts and brokerages see profits shrink, they will likely come up mwith even more creative fees and commission structures to protect their profits.

Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?


Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.